Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/32586
Authors: 
Carlsson, Fredrik
Kataria, Mitesh
Lampi, Elina
Löfgren, Åsa
Sterner, Thomas
Year of Publication: 
2010
Series/Report no.: 
Jena economic research papers 2010,019
Abstract: 
By using a choice experiment, this paper focuses on citizens' preferences for effort-sharing rules of how carbon abatement should be shared among countries. We find that Swedes do not rank the rule favoring their own country highest. Instead, they prefer the rule where all countries are allowed to emit an equal amount per person, a rule that favors Africa at the expense of high emitters such as the U.S. The least preferred rule is reduction proportional to historical emissions. Using two different treatments, one where the respondents were informed about the country names and one where the country names were replaced with anonymous labels A-D, we also test whether people's preferences for effort-sharing rules depend on the framing of the problem. We find that while the ranking of the principles is the same in both treatments, the strength of the preferences is significantly increased when the actual names of the countries are used.
Subjects: 
climate change
fairness
framing
ethics
effort-sharing rules
JEL: 
D03
Q54
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
298.62 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.