Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/31934 
Kompletter Metadatensatz
DublinCore-FeldWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorBrixy, Udoen
dc.contributor.authorGrotz, Reinholden
dc.date.accessioned2006-10-09-
dc.date.accessioned2010-05-14T11:23:15Z-
dc.date.available2010-05-14T11:23:15Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/31934-
dc.description.abstractThere is a large body of literature on the determinants of regional variation in new firm formation. In contrast there are few articles on the spatial differences in new firm survival. Using panel data we analyse both items for 74 western German regions over a ten-year period. The positive relationship between entry and exit which is often stated suggests a negative correlation between entry and survival. On the other hand, however, it seems convincing that regions with high birth rates should also have high survival rates, because a favourable environment for the founding of new firms should also be encouraging for the development of these firms. However, an analysis of both rates for 74 western German regions over a ten-year period reveals the existence of a negative relationship in general. This means that the survival rates are below average in regions with high birth rates. Despite this overall correlation, however, it is shown that the spatial pattern of a combination of both rates is complex, and all types of possible relationships exist. With a multivariate panel analysis we study the factors that influence regional birth and survival rates using the same set of independent variables. It is shown that in the service sector most variables literally work in opposite directions in the birth and survival rates models. But this does not hold for the manufacturing sector. This can be rated as evidence for the 'supportive environment thesis'. The reason for this is a completely different outcome of the estimated birth rates models for both industry sectors, whereas there are only minor differences in the estimated survival rate models. We can therefore deduce firstly that the two industries have different requirements for their 'seed bed' but not for their further successful development; and secondly, that the spatial structures which increase the number of newly founded businesses in the service sector are detrimental to the survival rates of newly founded firms.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aInstitut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB) |cNürnbergen
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aIAB-Discussion Paper |x5/2006en
dc.subject.jelR11en
dc.subject.jelJ23en
dc.subject.jelL25en
dc.subject.jelM13en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.keywordUnternehmensgründungen
dc.subject.keywordregionale Disparitäten
dc.subject.keywordUnternehmenserfolgen
dc.subject.keywordWirtschaftszweigeen
dc.subject.keywordWestdeutschlanden
dc.subject.keywordBundesrepublik Deutschlanden
dc.subject.stwRäumliche Verteilungen
dc.subject.stwUnternehmensgründungen
dc.subject.stwErfolgsfaktoren
dc.subject.stwDeutschlanden
dc.titleRegional patterns and determinants of new firm formation and survival in Western Germany-
dc.type|aWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn518511413en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:iab:iabdpa:200605en

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
373.29 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.