Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/31116 
Kompletter Metadatensatz
DublinCore-FeldWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorStrobl, Carolinen
dc.contributor.authorBoulesteix, Anne-Laureen
dc.contributor.authorZeileis, Achimen
dc.contributor.authorHothorn, Torstenen
dc.date.accessioned2006-10-16-
dc.date.accessioned2010-05-14T10:14:14Z-
dc.date.available2010-05-14T10:14:14Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.pidoi:10.5282/ubm/epub.1858en
dc.identifier.piurn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-1858-9en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/31116-
dc.description.abstractVariable importance measures for random forests have been receiving increased attention as a means of variable selection in many classification tasks in bioinformatics and related scientific fields, for instance to select a subset of genetic markers relevant for the prediction of a certain disease. We show that random forest variable importance measures are a sensible means for variable selection in many applications, but are not reliable in situations where potential predictor variables vary in their scale level or their number of categories. This is particularly important in genomics and computational biology, where predictors often include variables of different types, for example when predictors include both sequence data and continuous variables such as folding energy, or when amino acid sequence data show different numbers of categories. Simulation studies are presented illustrating that, when random forest variable importance measures are used with data of varying types, the results are misleading because suboptimal predictor variables may be artificially preferred in variable selection. The two mechanisms underlying this deficiency are biased variable selection in the individual classification trees used to build the random forest on one hand, and effects induced by bootstrap sampling with replacement on the other hand. We propose to employ an alternative implementation of random forests, that provides unbiased variable selection in the individual classification trees. When this method is applied using subsampling without replacement, the resulting variable importance measures can be used reliably for variable selection even in situations where the potential predictor variables vary in their scale level or their number of categories. The usage of both random forest algorithms and their variable importance measures in the R system for statistical computing is illustrated and documented thoroughly in an application re-analysing data from a study on RNA editing. Therefore the suggested method can be applied straightforwardly by scientists in bioinformatics research.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Sonderforschungsbereich 386 - Statistische Analyse diskreter Strukturen |cMünchenen
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aDiscussion Paper |x490en
dc.subject.ddc519en
dc.subject.keywordrandom forestsen
dc.subject.keywordvariable importanceen
dc.subject.keywordGini importanceen
dc.subject.keywordvariable selection biasen
dc.titleBias in random forest variable importance measures: illustrations, sources and a solution-
dc.type|aWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn518774066en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
483.44 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.