Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/29884
Authors: 
Kerber, Wolfgang
Vezzoso, Simonetta
Year of Publication: 
2004
Series/Report no.: 
Marburger volkswirtschaftliche Beiträge 2004,14
Abstract: 
The EU competition policy in regard to vertical restraints is mainly based upon neoclassical efficiency-oriented reasonings, leading to a neglect of the innovation dimension. This paper analyses to what extent evolutionary theories of competition and innovation economics can be used to derive additional, new criteria for the assessment of vertical restraints. It is shown that Neo- Schumpeterian and Hayekian approaches to competition and innovation economics as well as knowledge-based theories of the firm are capable to provide a basis for a different framework for analysing the impact of vertical agreements. Specific evolutionary arguments, such as subjective and local knowledge, the heterogeneity of knowledge bases of firms, communication and learning problems, and the complementarity of knowledge (systemic innovations) can be used for deriving additional, new assessment criteria for vertical restraints. The analysis is made against the background of the most recent reforms of EU competition rules in regard to vertical restraints. It also shows how evolutionary approaches to competition and innovation might be used for competition policy.
Subjects: 
European competition policy
vertical restraints
evolutionary economics
innovation economics
JEL: 
K21
L42
B52
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
83.05 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.