Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/28732 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2009
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
PFH Forschungspapiere/Research Papers No. 2009/02
Verlag: 
PFH Private Fachochschule Göttingen, Göttingen
Zusammenfassung: 
The quality of institutions is considerable worse in Central Asia than in other transition countries. Based on a panel of 25 transition countries for the period from 1996 to 2005, this paper shows that oil and aid exert a negative influence on institutional development. At the same time, transition countries benefited from external incentives due to cultural proximity to the West or a membership perspective in either EU or NATO. However, the evaluation for Central Asia reveals that aid, oil, and geography explain part of the backlog but, even accounting for the fact that the countries are "far away" and do not benefit from external incentives as do other transition countries, there is a strong and homogenous negative regional component of bad governance. Hence, change might come but at a very low pace.
Schlagwörter: 
EU
NATO
Transition Economies
Institutional Change
Governance
Central Asia
JEL: 
F15
F20
F50
P20
P30
O19
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
1.47 MB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.