Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/27758 
Kompletter Metadatensatz
DublinCore-FeldWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorChrist, Julian P.en
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-09-
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-09T11:55:23Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-09T11:55:23Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.piurn:nbn:de:bsz:100-opus-3368en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/27758-
dc.description.abstractDespite the increasing and newly inspired interests in geographical economics and industry location theory, the majority of existing New Economic Geography models ignores the interdependence between spatial concentration, knowledge diffusion, invention and growth. For this reason, the paper exclusively surveys the emergence and development of New Economic Geography Growth models in the context of the existing geography of innovation literature. The first part of the paper contributes with a classification of first- and second-nature causes of agglomeration and clustering. This part will also discriminate between static and dynamic externalities. Therefore, the chapter particularly compiles the differences between urbanization and localization externalities, and MAR, Jacobian and Porter externalities. A second concern of the paper is to highlight the modeling peculiarities of New Economic Geography Growth models. Besides approaching the main differences and similarities between first- and second-generation NEG models, the paper additionally reviews and discloses complemental contributions to the geography of innovation literature in the course of time. For this purpose, the paper examines in a meta-study 61 empirical contributions, which are related to the knowledge production function, the concept of spatial dependence and knowledge spillovers. The meta-study is complemented by bibliometric research. The paper ultimately concludes that the empirical studies that are related to the concept of (localized) knowledge spillovers and spatial association have caused a fundamental upgrading of the New Economic Geography literature towards non-pecuniary externalities. Consequently, the paper shows that recently developed second-generation NEG models offer alternative backward and forward linkages, which similarly determine centripetal and centrifugal forces, circular causality and finally the geography of innovation.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aUniversität Hohenheim, Forschungszentrum Innovation und Dienstleistung (FZID) |cStuttgarten
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aFZID Discussion Paper |x01-2009en
dc.subject.jelF12en
dc.subject.jelO31en
dc.subject.jelR11en
dc.subject.jelR12en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.keywordNew Economic Geography Growthen
dc.subject.keywordgeography of innvationen
dc.subject.keywordlocalized knowledge spilloversen
dc.subject.keyworddynamic externalitiesen
dc.subject.keywordcore-peripheryen
dc.subject.keywordspatial growthen
dc.subject.keywordknowledge production functionen
dc.subject.keywordagglomerationen
dc.subject.stwNeue ökonomische Geographieen
dc.subject.stwRegionale Wachstumstheorieen
dc.subject.stwInnovationen
dc.subject.stwRegionale Konzentrationen
dc.subject.stwWissenen
dc.subject.stwSpillover-Effekten
dc.subject.stwKern-Peripherie-Beziehungen
dc.titleNew Economic Geography reloaded: Localized knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation-
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn629628688en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:fziddp:200901en

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
1.33 MB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.