Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/25888
Authors: 
Brueckner, Jan Keith
Largey, Ann G.
Year of Publication: 
2006
Series/Report no.: 
CESifo working paper 1843
Abstract: 
Various authors, most notably Putnam (2000), have argued that low-density living reduces social capital and thus social interaction, and this argument has been used to buttress criticisms of urban sprawl. If low densities in fact reduce social interaction, then an externality arises, validating Putnam’s critique. In choosing their own lot sizes, consumers would fail to consider the loss of interaction benefits for their neighbors when lot size is increased. Lot sizes would then be inefficiently large, and cities excessively spread out. The paper tests the premise of this argument (the existence of a positive link between interaction and density) using data from the Social Capital Benchmark Survey. In the empirical work, social interaction measures for individual survey respondents are regressed on census-tract density and a host of household characteristics, using an instrumental-variable approach to control for the potential endogeneity of density.
JEL: 
R1
J11
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
185.52 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.