Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/23508 
Kompletter Metadatensatz
DublinCore-FeldWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorGoethals, George R.en
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-29T16:09:42Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-29T16:09:42Z-
dc.date.issued2001-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/23508-
dc.description.abstractA study was conducted to examine peer effects among undergraduates at Williams College, a highly selective four-year liberal arts school. Specifically, the study explored whether students would perform better writing about newspaper articles they read and discussed in academically homogeneous or heterogeneous groups of three. In homogeneous groups all three students were from either the top half or bottom half of their class on academic ratings assigned at the time of admission. Heterogeneous groups included students from both the top and bottom half of their class. The results showed that students in the top and bottom half performed similarly overall, but that students performed better in homogeneous groups, whether those homogeneous groups were made up of students in the top half or the bottom half of their classes. This pattern of results was stronger for men subjects than women subjects. The results were interpreted in terms of the principles of social comparison theory (Festinger, 1954).en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aWilliams College, Williams Project on the Economics of Higher Education (WPEHE) |cWilliamstown, MAen
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aWPEHE Discussion Paper |x61en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.stwBildungsverhaltenen
dc.subject.stwStudiumen
dc.subject.stwGeschlechten
dc.subject.stwUSAen
dc.subject.stwpeer effectsen
dc.titlePeer effects, gender, and intellectual performance among students at a highly selective college : a social comparison of abilities analysis-
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn366115758en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
42.53 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.