Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/22015 
Kompletter Metadatensatz
DublinCore-FeldWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorBirnbaum, Michael H.en
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Ulrichen
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-29T14:13:28Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-29T14:13:28Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/22015-
dc.description.abstractRecently proposed models of risky choice imply systematic violations of transitivity of preference. Five studies explored whether people show patterns of intransitivity predicted by four descriptive models. To distinguish ?true? violations from those produced by ?error,? a model was fit in which each choice can have a different error rate and each person can have a different pattern of true preferences that need not be transitive. Error rate for a choice is estimated from preference reversals between repeated presentations of the same choice. Results of five studies showed that very few people repeated intransitive patterns. We can retain the hypothesis that transitivity best describes the data of the vast majority of participants.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aKiel University, Department of Economics |cKielen
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aEconomics Working Paper |x2006-10en
dc.subject.jelC91en
dc.subject.jelD81en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.keyworddecision makingen
dc.subject.keyworderrorsen
dc.subject.keywordgambling effecten
dc.subject.keywordreference pointsen
dc.subject.keywordregreten
dc.subject.keywordtransitivityen
dc.subject.stwEntscheidung bei Unsicherheiten
dc.subject.stwEntscheidung bei Risikoen
dc.subject.stwPräferenztheorieen
dc.subject.stwExperimenten
dc.subject.stwTheorieen
dc.subject.stwDeutschlanden
dc.titleEmpirical Tests of Intransitivity Predicted by Models of Risky Choice-
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn518266796en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:cauewp:5101en

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
550.69 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.