EconStor >
Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel (CAU) >
Department of Economics, Universität Kiel  >
Economics Working Papers, Department of Economics, CAU Kiel >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/21979
  
Title:Environmental Policy Tools and Firm-Level Management Practices : Empirical Evidence for Germany. PDF Logo
Authors:Frondel, Manuel
Horbach, Jens
Rennings, Klaus
Requate, Till
Issue Date:2004
Series/Report no.:Economics working paper / Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel, Department of Economics 2004,02
Abstract:On the basis of abundant facility and firm-level data for German manufacturing, originating from a recent OECD-survey, this paper empirically investigates the relevance of a variety of incentives for environmentally innovative behavior of facilities, the respective influence of pressure groups, and the impact of both regulatory and market-based policy instruments, such as eco-taxes. Since the early 1990s, Environmental Management Systems (EMS), specifically, have become a vital voluntary complement to mandatory environmental policies based on regulation and legislation. EMS may be perceived as an organizational environmental innovation that may lead to improved environmental performance. While the paper provides a descriptive analysis of the determinants for EMS-adoption and incentives that may trigger environmental innovation activities within German facilities, the major questions that will be addressed in this paper are: (1) How can public authorities support the introduction of management practices that may lead to improved environmental performance? (2) What are the main determinants of environmentally innovative behavior of firms? Specifically, we are interested in the role that market forces and regulation play in the process of complex firm decisions on innovation and environmental performance. While the relevant literature on these issues is dominated by case studies, our large-scale survey indicates that the most important reasons why firms contemplate introducing EMS are to improve the efforts to achieve regulatory compliance, to improve the corporate image, and to create cost savings with respect to both waste management and resource input. Among pressure groups, internal stakeholders - management employees and corporate headquarters - appear to be more influential with respect to EMS-adoption and environmental innovation than external forces, such as public authorities.
Subjects:Environmental Management Systems
EMAS
Environmental Policy Instruments
JEL:Q50
L50
Persistent Identifier of the first edition:urn:nbn:de:101:1-200910132048
Document Type:Working Paper
Appears in Collections:Economics Working Papers, Department of Economics, CAU Kiel

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
EWP-2004-02.pdf1.11 MBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/21979

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.