Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/21380 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2002
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 548
Verlag: 
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
Zusammenfassung: 
Propensity score matching is widely used in treatment evaluation to estimate average treatment effects. Nevertheless, the role of the propensity score is still controversial. Since the propensity score is usually unknown and has to be estimated, the efficiency loss arising from not knowing the true propensity score is examined. Hahn (1998) derived the asymptotic variance bounds for known and unknown propensity scores. Whereas the variance of the average treatment effect is unaffected by knowledge of the propensity score, the bound for the treatment effect on the treated changes if the propensity score is known. However, the reasons for this remain unclear. In this paper it is shown that knowledge of the propensity score does not lead to a ?dimension reduction?. Instead it enables a more efficient estimation of the distribution of the confounding variables.
Schlagwörter: 
evaluation
matching
causal effect
semiparametric efficiency bound
JEL: 
C14
C13
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
409.67 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.