@techreport{Seidl2012Petersburg,
abstract = {The Petersburg Paradox and its solutions are formulated in a uniform arrangement centered around d'Alembert's ratio test. All its aspects are captured using three mappings, a mapping from the natural numbers to the space of the winnings, a utility function defined on the space of the winnings, and a transformation of the utilities of the winnings. The main attempts at a solution of the Petersburg Paradox are labeled according to their most fervent proponents, viz. Bernoulli and Cramer, Buffon, and Menger. This paper also investigates the role of the probabilities for the Petersburg Paradox: they may well be used to solve a Petersburg Paradox, or to re-gain it by means of appropriate transformations. Thus, the probabilities are also instrumental for the Petersburg Paradox. The Petersburg Paradox can only be avoided for bounded utility functions. Its various solution proposals are but disguised attempts of filling in the missing behavioral justification for the boundedness of utility functions. This paper also corrects several misconceptions which have crept in the respective literature.},
address = {Kiel},
author = {Christian Seidl},
copyright = {http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen},
keywords = {330; Entscheidung bei Risiko; Erwartungsnutzen; Zeitpr\"{a}ferenz; Theorie},
language = {eng},
number = {2012-04},
publisher = {Univ., Dep. of Economics},
title = {The Petersburg Paradox: Menger revisited},
type = {Economics working paper, Christian-Albrechts-Universit\"{a}t Kiel, Department of Economics},
url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10419/56036},
year = {2012}
}