Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/73395 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2009
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
BGPE Discussion Paper No. 84
Verlag: 
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Bavarian Graduate Program in Economics (BGPE), Nürnberg
Zusammenfassung: 
Recent empirical studies suggest a need for a flexible patent regime responding to industry characteristics. In practice, sector-specific modifications of patent strength already exist but lack theoretical foundation. This paper intends to make up for this neglect by scrutinizing in what direction industry characteristics influence optimal patent strength. It is found that patents ought to be weaker, the more intense competition, the higher R&D productivity, and the more intricate reverse engineering are. Unlike similar step-by-step innovation models of economic growth, the model assumes Cournot competition and introduces an empirically substantiated measure of sector differences in the ability to catch up with the technological leader. It is found that for most empirically plausible cases the familiar inverted-U between patent length and growth carries over to the Cournot set-up.
Schlagwörter: 
Competition
endogenous growth
?exible patent protection
imitation
innovation
R&D
reverse engineering
Schumpeterian growth
Supplementary Protection Certi?cates
JEL: 
O31
O34
O41
L16
K20
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
2.19 MB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.