Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/57623 
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBerger, Axelen
dc.contributor.authorBusse, Matthiasen
dc.contributor.authorNunnenkamp, Peteren
dc.contributor.authorRoy, Martinen
dc.date.accessioned2010-11-17-
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-26T12:03:02Z-
dc.date.available2012-04-26T12:03:02Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.pidoi:10.30875/ec4fa856-en-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/57623-
dc.description.abstractWe focus on investor-state dispute settlement provisions contained in various, though far from all, bilateral investment treaties as a possible determinant of BIT-related effects on bilateral FDI flows. Our estimation results prove to be sensitive to the specification of these provisions as well as the inclusion of transition countries in the sample. Stricter dispute settlement provisions do not necessarily result in higher FDI inflows so that the effectiveness of BITs as a credible commitment device remains elusive.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aWorld Trade Organization (WTO) |cGenevaen
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aWTO Staff Working Paper |xERSD-2010-10en
dc.subject.jelF21en
dc.subject.jelF23en
dc.subject.jelK33en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.keywordDispute Settlementen
dc.subject.keywordBITsen
dc.subject.keywordFDI flowsen
dc.subject.stwInvestitionsgarantieen
dc.subject.stwInternationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeiten
dc.subject.stwDirektinvestitionen
dc.subject.stwKapitalimporten
dc.subject.stwSchätzungen
dc.subject.stwWelten
dc.titleMore stringent BITs, less ambiguous effects on FDI? Not a bit!-
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn639996906en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:wtowps:ERSD201010en

Files in This Item:
File
Size
166.28 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.