Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/53311 
Authors: 
Year of Publication: 
2011
Series/Report no.: 
Nota di Lavoro No. 42.2011
Publisher: 
Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM), Milano
Abstract: 
This paper presents a game-theoretic model of network formation, which allows agents to enter bilateral alliances and to extract payoffs from enemies. Each pair of agents creates a surplus of one, which allies divide in equal parts. If agents are enemies, then the agent with more allies obtains a larger share of the surplus. I show that Nash equilibria are of two types. First, a state of utopia, where all agents are allies. Second, asymmetric equilibria, such that agents can be partitioned into sets of different size, where agents within the same set are allies and agents in different sets are enemies. These results stand in contrast to coalition formation games in the economics of conflict literature, where stable group structures are generally symmetric. The model provides a game-theoretic foundation for structural balance, a long- standing notion in social psychology, which has been fruitfully applied to the study of alliance formation in international relations.
Subjects: 
Network Formation
Economics of Conflict
Contest Success Function
Structural Balance
International Relations
JEL: 
D86
D74
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
351.58 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.