Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/52406 
Authors: 
Year of Publication: 
2011
Series/Report no.: 
GIGA Working Papers No. 177
Publisher: 
German Institute of Global and Area Studies (GIGA), Hamburg
Abstract: 
Direct military rule has become rare in world politics. Today, most military regimes have either given way to some form of democracy or been transformed into another form of authoritarianism. This article formulates an analytical framework for the detachment of militaries from politics and identifies positive and negative factors for a withdrawal. It then applies this framework to the case of Burma/Myanmar, which is an example of deeply entrenched military rule. It is argued that the retreat from direct rule has brought with it a further institutionalization of military rule in politics, since the military was able to safeguard its interests and design the new electoral authoritarian regime according to its own purposes. The article identifies the internal dynamics within the military regime as a prime motive for a reform of the military regime. Although the external environment has completely changed over the last two decades, this had only a minor impact on military politics. The opposition could not profit from the regime's factionalization and external sanctions and pressure have been undermined by Asian engagement.
Subjects: 
military regime
civilian control
external influences
internal influences
competitive authoritarianism
Burma/Myanmar
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.