Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/39844 
Year of Publication: 
2010
Series/Report no.: 
CESifo Working Paper No. 3160
Publisher: 
Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo), Munich
Abstract: 
Fiscal policy has become quite controversial in the post-Keynesian era, the debate over the Obama stimulus package being a contentious recent example. Some pundits go so far as to take the position that macroeconomic theory has failed to meaningfully progress in terms of providing useful recommendations for policy-makers, particularly in times of recession. Others take the laissez-faire view that policy reactions to the business cycle do not help in a rational expectations world and indeed do harm by increasing uncertainty. Still others, while not necessarily viewing themselves as in any sense 'Keynesian,' have a nagging feeling that sometimes doing nothing must be worse than doing something...but what to do? Sensible guidance is provided here on how governments should spend taxpayer dollars and on how that spending should change under varying economic conditions. The nature of public goods, namely whether they are complements, substitutes, or neutral to private goods, is seen to be critical to such decisions.
Subjects: 
fiscal policy
business cycles
public goods
recessions
boomtimes
JEL: 
E12
E13
E32
E61
E62
E66
H11
H30
H50
Document Type: 
Working Paper
Appears in Collections:

Files in This Item:
File
Size
217.38 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.