Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/36369 
Year of Publication: 
2009
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 4390
Publisher: 
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
Using a unique dataset we study both the actual and self-perceived relationship between subjective well-being and income comparisons against a wide range of potential comparison groups, enabling us to investigate a broader range of questions than in previous studies. In questions inserted into a 2008 module of the German-Socio Economic Panel Study we ask subjects to report (a) how their income compares to various groups, such a co-workers, friends, and neighbours, and (b) how important these income comparisons are to them. We find substantial gender differences, with income comparisons being much better predictors of subjective well-being in men than in women. Generic (same-gender) comparisons are the most important, followed by within profession comparisons. Once generic and within-profession comparisons are controlled for, income relative to neighbours has a negative coefficient, implying that living in a high-income neighbourhood increases happiness. The perceived importance of income comparisons is found to be uncorrelated with its actual relationship to subjective well-being, suggesting that people are unconscious of its real impact. Subjects who judge comparisons to be important are, however, significantly less happy than subjects who see income comparisons as unimportant. Finally, the marginal effect of relative income on subjective well-being does not depend on whether a subject is below or above the reference group income.
Subjects: 
Income comparisons
relative income
life satisfaction
German Socio Economic Panel Study
SOEP
JEL: 
D31
D62
D63
I3
I31
Z13
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
293.16 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.