Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/36133 
Authors: 
Year of Publication: 
2009
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 4583
Publisher: 
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
The standard human-capital model is based on the assumption that the observed wage of an individual is equal to the monetary value of the individual net human-capital productivity, the so-called net potential wage. We argue that this assumption is rejected by the ECHP data for Belgium, Denmark and Finland. The empirical evidence supports a dynamic approach to the Mincer equation where no equality is imposed but an adjustment between observed and potential earnings is allowed to take place over time. Controlling for regressors' endogeneity, individual heterogeneity and time effects, we estimate a dynamic panel-data wage equation and provide measures of the speed of adjustment in Belgium, Denmark and Finland. Further, we elaborate on the implications of a dynamic approach to the Mincer equation for the computation of the return to schooling, including the implication that this return is not independent of labor-market experience, as suggested by Heckman et al. (2005) and Belzil (2007). Finally, we show that a dynamic wage equation can be seen as the solution of a simple wage-bargaining model and argue that a micro-founded model can fit the data better than a simple adjustment model but requires more theoretical assumptions.
Subjects: 
Mincer equation
wages
human capital
JEL: 
I21
J31
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
227.69 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.