Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/35730 
Year of Publication: 
2009
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 4029
Publisher: 
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
Using 2000 U.S. Census data we illustrate the importance of accounting for household specialization in lesbian couples when examining the sexual orientation gap in female labor supply. Specifically, we find the labor supply gap is substantially larger between married women and partnered lesbian women who specialize in market production (primary earners) than between married women and partnered lesbian women who specialize in household production (secondary earners). Using a semi-parametric decomposition approach, we further show that the role of children in explaining the mean labor supply gap by sexual orientation is greatly understated if the household division of labor between household and market production is not taken into account. Finally, we illustrate that controlling for children significantly reduces differences between married women and secondary lesbian earners both in terms of the decision to remain attached to the labor market (the extensive margin), as well as in terms of annual hours of work conditional on working (the intensive margin). Further, the effect of controlling for children is not uniform across the distribution of conditional annual hours; instead it primarily reduces the percentage of secondary lesbian earners working extremely high annual hours.
Subjects: 
Household specialization
female labor supply
sexual orientation
JEL: 
J22
J24
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
687.46 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.