Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/33346 
Year of Publication: 
2006
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 1942
Publisher: 
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
Several papers have tested the empirical validity of the migration models proposed by Borjas (1987) and Borjas, Bronars, and Trejo (1992). However, to our knowledge, none has been able to disentangle the separate impact of observable and unobservable individual characteristics, and their respective returns across different locations, on an individual's decision to migrate. We build a model in which individuals sort, in part, on potential earnings - where earnings across different locations are a function of both observable and unobservable characteristics. We focus on the inter-provincial migration patterns of Canadian physicians. We choose this particular group for several reasons including the fact that they are paid on a fee-for-service basis. Since wage rates are exogenous, earning differentials are driven by differences in productivity. We then estimate a mixed conditional-logit model to determine the effects of individual and destination-specific characteristics (particularly earnings differentials) on physician location decisions. We find, among other things, that high-productivity physicians (based on unobservables) are more likely to migrate to provinces where the productivity premium is greater, while low-productivity physicians are more likely to migrate to areas where the productivity premium is lower. These results are consistent with a modified Borjas model of self-selection in migration based on both unobservables and observables.
Subjects: 
migration
self-selection
earnings
longitudinal data
productivity
JEL: 
J24
J61
C23
C35
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
231.56 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.