Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/322226 
Year of Publication: 
2025
Series/Report no.: 
Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper No. TI 2025-041/III
Publisher: 
Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam and Rotterdam
Abstract: 
This paper compares the statistical and economic performance of state-of-the-art highfrequency based multivariate volatility models with a simpler, widely used alternative-the Exponentially Weighted Moving Average (EWMA) filter. Using over two decades of 100 U.S. stock returns (2002-2023), we assess model performance through a Global Minimum Variance portfolio optimization exercise across various forecast horizons. We find that the EWMA model consistently outperforms more complex HF-based volatility models, delivering significant utility gains when including transaction costs, due in part to its lower turnover. Even in the absence of transaction costs, the EWMA filter cannot be beaten in most cases. Our results are robust to various dimensions, including no-short-selling constraints, varying portfolio sizes, and alternative parameter choices, highlighting the continued relevance of the EWMA model in high-frequency-based portfolio allocation.
Subjects: 
multivariate volatility
high-frequency data
realized (co)variances
GMV portfolios
transaction costs
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.