Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/31651 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2009
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Working Paper No. 567
Verlag: 
Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson, NY
Zusammenfassung: 
Many heterodox strands of thought share both a concern with the study of different phases or growth regimes in the history of capitalism and the use of formal short-run models as an analytical tool. This text suggests that: (1) this strategy is potentially misleading; (2) that the stock-flow consistent (SFC) approach, while providing a general framework that may facilitate the dialogue among those currents, is particularly well suited to all those who think that macroeconomic models may illuminate historical quests; and (3) this approach's main intuitions may be conveyed through the benchmark” Post Keynesian SFC model presented by Dos Santos and Zezza (2008), dispensing with the complex computer simulations that are normally employed by SFC authors.
Schlagwörter: 
Stock-flow consistency
long-run analyses
post Keynesian macroeconomics
neo-Kaleckian macroeconomics
régulation school
financialization
JEL: 
B50
E12
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
571.01 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.