Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/284197 
Year of Publication: 
2023
Series/Report no.: 
School of Economics Discussion Papers No. 2301
Publisher: 
University of Kent, School of Economics, Canterbury
Abstract: 
We investigate links between routine-biased technical change, the structure of occupational employment, and cross-country income differences. To implement this, we combine several data sources including national labour force surveys and Penn World Tables. We first document that in our novel dataset spanning 92 countries there is a negative relationship between the employment share of routine occupations and GDP per hour worked. We then conduct a development accounting exercise where we differentiate labour inputs by occupation and allow for occupationspecific technologies. We find a systematic relationship between occupation-specific technologies and GDP per hour worked. More developed economies use technologies that are more routine-biased. The productivity of routine labour is about 11 times higher in the top 25 percent than in the bottom 25 percent of countries ranked by GDP per hour worked. International differences in this routine labour technology by themselves account for about 13 percent of the 90-10 ratio of GDP per hour worked, whereas differences in abstract labour technology do not contribute to the observed GDP dispersion. Eliminating all occupations' and capital's technology differences across the world would compress the GDP distribution by 35 to 41 percent.
Subjects: 
biased technical change
employment structure
income differences
development accounting
JEL: 
O10
O33
O41
J21
J24
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.