Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/277179 
Authors: 
Year of Publication: 
2010
Citation: 
[Journal:] Intervention. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies [ISSN:] 2195-3376 [Volume:] 07 [Issue:] 1 [Year:] 2010 [Pages:] 109-124
Publisher: 
Metropolis-Verlag, Marburg
Abstract: 
As a core element in mainstream neoclassical theory we assume that economic agents behave rationally. They have full information about everything of economic relevance at present, as well as concerning the future. They either maximize their profit or their utility. Is the model of the rational economic man realistic and a useful concept? According to post-Keynesians and the school of bounded rationality (e.g. the works of Herbert Simon and others) the answer to this question is ›No‹. In this paper we discuss some aspects of bounded rationality and the position taken by Keynes and by the post-Keynesians who argued that actual behaviour is restricted and less than perfect due to the existence of fundamental uncertainty as pointed out by Keynes in his General Theory. Therefore, the macroeconomic system should be seen as an open, changeable and path-dependent system.
Subjects: 
uncertainty
bounded rationality
post-Keynesian economics
JEL: 
B22
B41
E12
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.