Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/268887 
Year of Publication: 
2023
Citation: 
[Journal:] Comparative Political Studies [ISSN:] 1552-3829 [Issue:] OnlineFirst [Publisher:] Sage Publications [Place:] Thousand Oaks, CA [Year:] 2023 [Pages:] 1-33
Publisher: 
Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
Abstract: 
Mass mobilization (MM) is an important driver of political change. While some citizens organize in favor of more democratic institutions, others take to the streets to support an authoritarian status quo. This article introduces measures of pro-democratic and pro-autocratic MM using expert assessments for 179 polities from 1900–2021. The data allow us to trace patterns in MM over time, across regions and regime types. We use this new data to systematically analyze the relationship between both types of mobilization and regime change. We confirm the findings of the literature on contentious democratic politics, and our analysis of autocratic mobilization allows us to make sense of the controversy in the literature on “bad actors” in civil society. We show that MM in favor of autocracy negatively affects democracy, making a case for specifying the goals of the actors involved in contentious politics to more precisely understand their impact.
Subjects: 
democratization and regime change
social movements
quality of democracy
civil society
mass mobilization
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Published Version

Files in This Item:





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.