Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/266346 
Year of Publication: 
2022
Series/Report no.: 
Discussion Paper No. 2022/8
Publisher: 
Freie Universität Berlin, School of Business & Economics, Berlin
Abstract: 
Using a new experimental design, we compare how subjects form beliefs in an investor-client setup under varying degrees of liability. Our results reflect the importance of social preferences when making investment decisions for others. We show that when investors have no liability, those with stronger social preferences are more optimistic about the probability that their investment results in a gain. In other words, we find that social preferences appear to be correlated with motivated beliefs. This finding suggests the existence of cognitive biases in financial decision-making and supports the recent literature on the formation of motivated beliefs under limited liability (Barberis, 2015; Bénabou and Tirole, 2016).
Subjects: 
Moral Hazard
Experiment
Motivated Beliefs
Social Preferences
JEL: 
C91
D84
G11
G41
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
645.48 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.