Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/250502 
Year of Publication: 
2021
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 14841
Publisher: 
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
The existence of large child penalties has been documented for multiple countries and time periods. In this paper, we assess to what extent marriage decisions and pregnancies (rather than live births), which tend to occur around the birth of the first child, explain part of the so-called motherhood effect in labor market outcomes. Using data for 29 countries drawn from SHARE, we show that although marriage has a negative effect on women's employment (3.3%), its magnitude is much smaller compared with the negative effect of a first child (23%). Moreover, we find that pregnancies that end in non-live births have non-statistically significant effects in employment in the following years, supporting the exogeneity assumption underlying identification in child penalty studies. These new results lend support to the hypothesis that childcare, rather than marriage or pregnancy, is responsible for women exiting the labor force upon motherhood.
Subjects: 
pregnancy
non-live births
marriage
child penalty
motherhood
SHARE data
JEL: 
J13
J16
J24
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
336.62 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.