Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/246790 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2021
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] Comparative Economic Studies [ISSN:] 1478-3320 [Volume:] 63 [Issue:] 4 [Publisher:] Palgrave Macmillan [Place:] Basingstoke [Year:] 2021 [Pages:] 623-647
Verlag: 
Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke
Zusammenfassung: 
Challenging the initial expectation that all post-Soviet economies will evolve from collective toward fully individualized farming, I argue that they separated into two different reform paths. In the European successor countries and Kazakhstan, corporate and family farms coexist, labor exited agriculture, and capital inflow boosted labor productivity (a “Westernization”). In the Transcaucasian and the other Central Asian countries, complete farm individualization did not increase labor productivity much, in turn keeping rural incomes depressed (a “Southernization” akin to the Global South). Future policies should promote income alternatives to agriculture and improve the flexibility and transparency of farm consolidation processes.
Schlagwörter: 
agricultural restructuring
Post-Soviet countries
labor productivity
individual farm
JEL: 
E23
P27
P32
Q15
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by Logo
Dokumentart: 
Article
Dokumentversion: 
Published Version

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.