Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/242136 
Year of Publication: 
2018
Citation: 
[Journal:] DANUBE: Law, Economics and Social Issues Review [ISSN:] 1804-8285 [Volume:] 9 [Issue:] 4 [Publisher:] De Gruyter [Place:] Warsaw [Year:] 2018 [Pages:] 261-267
Publisher: 
De Gruyter, Warsaw
Abstract: 
The article analyses the significance of the ECJ preliminary ruling on competition law. Starting with the general characteristic of the preliminary ruling of the Court of Justice, its legal regulation in TFEU and its effects, it focuses on the concrete judgement of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 February 2013 in Case C-68/12 at the request of the Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic. It explains the preliminary questions and the background of the competition case that was the incentive for them. It describes the quite complicated cartel agreement of the three banks concerned and the impact of the ECJ preliminary ruling on the judgements/decisions of the case.
Subjects: 
Preliminary Ruling/Questions
Agreement Restricting Competition
Cartel
Procedure
Competition Authority
National Court
European Court of Justice
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by-nc-nd Logo
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size
177.94 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.