Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/237066 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2021
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
CHOPE Working Paper No. 2021-15
Verlag: 
Duke University, Center for the History of Political Economy (CHOPE), Durham, NC
Zusammenfassung: 
In recent academic and to some extent public debates, mainstream economics has been accused of excessive mathematization. The rejection of mathematical and other formal methods is often cited as a crucial trait of Austrian economics. Based on a systematic discussion of potential benefits and potential drawbacks of formalization in economics, the paper concludes that - contrary to the received view - the most prominent representatives of Austrian economists including Carl Menger, Ludwig Mises, and Friedrich August Hayek neither provide a justification for a rejection of formalization tout court nor actually reject it. Those Neo-Austrians who do, seem to rely on an unconvincing Sprachgeist argument traceable to Friedrich Wieser.
Schlagwörter: 
Austrian economics
essentialism
formalization
Friedrich Wieser
mathematical methods
praxeology
realisticness
JEL: 
B13
B16
B23
B25
B41
B50
B53
C00
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
764.3 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.