Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/232909 
Year of Publication: 
2021
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 14157
Publisher: 
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
While city migrants see their welfare increase much more than those moving to towns, many more rural-urban migrants end up in towns. This phenomenon, documented in detail in Kagera, Tanzania, begs the question why migrants move to seemingly suboptimal destinations. Using an 18-year panel of individuals from this region and information on the possible destinations from the census, this study documents, through dyadic regressions and controlling for individual heterogeneity, how the deterrence of further distance to cities (compared to towns) largely trumps the attraction from their promise of greater wealth, making towns more appealing destinations. Education mitigates these effects (lesser deterrence from distance; greater attraction from wealth), while poverty reduces the attraction of wealth, consistent with the notion of urban sorting. With about two thirds of the rural population in low-income countries living within two hours from a town, these findings underscore the importance of vibrant towns for inclusive development.
Subjects: 
Africa
internal migration
urbanization
secondary towns
JEL: 
J61
O15
O55
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
743.94 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.