Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/227150 
Year of Publication: 
2020
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 13623
Publisher: 
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
We document the evolution of hours of work using monthly data from February to June 2020. During this period, the Netherlands experienced a quick spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, enacted a lockdown for a period of six weeks and gradually opened thereafter. We show that during lock-down, substitutability between work from home and at the workplace or essential worker status are key to maintain a large fraction of pre-crisis hours of work. These pandemic-specific mechanisms become much less important as social distancing restrictions are eased in May and June. Labor supply recovers quickly in sectors affected heavily during lockdown, but goes down in other areas of the economy. The latter is unlikely caused by pandemic-induced supply changes; diminished demand is a more plausible explanation. Analyzing take-up of economic support programs, we find suggestive evidence that wage subsidies and other programs helped limit the early-stage impact of the crisis along the extensive margin.
Subjects: 
hours of work
telecommuting
essential workers
labor hoarding
COVID-19
JEL: 
J2
H3
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
811.62 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.