Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/223786 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2020
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 13344
Verlag: 
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn
Zusammenfassung: 
Credence goods markets with their asymmetric information between buyers and sellers are prone to large inefficiencies. In theory, poorly informed consumers can protect themselves from maltreatment through sellers by asking for second opinions from other sellers. Yet, empirical evidence whether this is a successful strategy is scarce. Here we present a natural field experiment in the market for computer repairs. We find that revealing a second opinion from another expert to the seller does neither increase the rate of successful repairs nor decrease the average repair price. We assess under which conditions gathering a second opinion can be valuable.
Schlagwörter: 
credence goods
expert services
second opinions
natural field experiment
JEL: 
C93
D82
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
373.56 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.