Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/220189 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2015
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Discussion Paper No. 100
Verlag: 
Institute for Applied Economic Research (ipea), Brasília
Zusammenfassung: 
Based on three versions of a small macroeconomic model for Brazil, this paper presents empirical evidence on the effects of parameter uncertainty on monetary policy rules and on the robustness of optimal and simple rules over different model specifications. By comparing the optimal policy rule under parameter uncertainty with the rule calculated under purely additive uncertainty, we find that parameter uncertainty should make policymakers react less aggressively to the economy's state variables, as suggested by Brainard's 'conservatism principle', although this effect seems to be relatively small. We then informally investigate each rule's robustness by analyzing the performance of policy rules derived from each model under each one of the alternative models. We find that optimal rules derived from each model perform very poorly under alternative models, whereas a simple Taylor rule is relatively robust. We also find that even within a specific model, the Taylor rule may perform better than the optimal rule under particularly unfavorable realizations from the policymaker's loss distribution function.
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
270.08 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.