Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/214574 
Year of Publication: 
2015
Series/Report no.: 
CREMA Working Paper No. 2015-09
Publisher: 
Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Zürich
Abstract: 
This paper discusses several problems of direct popular decisions. In the first part, we consid- er problems related to the functioning of direct democracy. As a political system it only makes sense if there exists a continuous process and not if only occasional single questions are brought to a referendum. Then, the relation between direct democracy and the rule of unanim- ity is discussed, a subject of special relevance to the European Union, before we consider the role of quorums. In the second part, some areas are considered in which conflicts might arise. Results of initiatives might be incompatible with individual human rights or might endanger fiscal sustainability, and referenda might impede economic reforms. All these problems, how- ever, do not justify a general re jection of direct popular rights . Thus, we conclude by listing several points that should be observed to safeguard the well-functioning of direct democracy.
Subjects: 
Direct democracy
referendum
initiative
human rights
economic re- forms
fiscal sustainability
JEL: 
H11
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
179.2 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.