Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/210837 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2017
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
CREDIT Research Paper No. 17/10
Verlag: 
The University of Nottingham, Centre for Research in Economic Development and International Trade (CREDIT), Nottingham
Zusammenfassung: 
Improving ways to assess development efforts is an important task. Yet, little has been done to understand the connection between the effectiveness of NGOs and their financial accountability. We use Benford's Law to assess accuracy of financial reports by a sample of Ugandan NGOs. We find 25% of the sample provide financial information that may be inaccurate to the true values. We find NGOs with better beneficiary ratings are more likely to submit credible financial data. This contradicts the belief that upward accountability demands crowd out serving the client community. We also distinguish between the decision to withhold some requested financial information and the decision to report inaccurately. We find no evidence that the two decisions are related, with the former decision due to limited capacity and skills. The results suggest a bigger role for beneficiary assessments in monitoring the sector, rather than an increasing demand for financial reporting.
Schlagwörter: 
NGOs
diversification
risk aversions
motivations
historic flood
JEL: 
L25
L31
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
1.37 MB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.