Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/204919 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2018
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Discussion Papers No. 18-19
Verlag: 
University of Bern, Department of Economics, Bern
Zusammenfassung: 
Using a novel data set, we reassess the evidence for (or against) a key implication of the basic RBC model: that aggregate hours worked respond positively to a positive technology shock. Two novel aspects of the analysis are the scope (14 OECD countries) and the inclusion of data on both labor supply margins to analyze the key margin of adjustment in aggregate hours. We show that the short-run response of aggregate hours to a positive technology shock is remarkably similar across countries, with an impact fall in 13 out of 14 countries. In contrast, the decomposition of the aggregate hours results into intensive and extensive margins shows substantial heterogeneity in the labor market dynamics across OECD countries. For instance, movements in the intensive margin are the dominant channel of adjustment in aggregate hours in 5 out of 14 countries of our sample, including France and Japan.
Schlagwörter: 
Structural VAR
technology shocks
aggregate hours worked
labor supply margins
relative price of investment
JEL: 
E24
E32
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
1.18 MB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.