Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/200441 
Year of Publication: 
2017
Series/Report no.: 
CeDEx Discussion Paper Series No. 2017-07
Publisher: 
The University of Nottingham, Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics (CeDEx), Nottingham
Abstract: 
This paper investigates the contribution of social comparison effects to the disappointment aversion previously identified in a two-person real-effort competition (Gill and Prowse, 2012). "Social" and "asocial" versions of the Gill and Prowse experiment are compared, where the latter treatment involves a competition against Nature and removes the scope for social comparisons. If disappointment aversion simply reflects an asymmetric evaluation of losses and gains it is expected to survive in the asocial treatment, whereas treatment differences are expected if losing to or winning against another person affects the evaluation of losses/gains. The main result is that behaviour is very similar in social and asocial treatments, suggesting that social comparisons have little impact in this setting. Two other unexpected findings of the paper are that prize effects are much weaker than those identified in Gill and Prowse (2012) and, in neither treatment is there evidence of disappointment aversion.
Subjects: 
real effort competition
social comparison effects
disappointment aversion
reference-dependent preferences
JEL: 
C91
D12
D81
D84
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.