Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/195234 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2016
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] Latin American Economic Review [ISSN:] 2196-436X [Volume:] 25 [Issue:] 1 [Article No.:] 5 [Publisher:] Springer [Place:] Heidelberg [Year:] 2016 [Pages:] 1-19
Verlag: 
Springer, Heidelberg
Zusammenfassung: 
In this paper, we analyze the nature of cooperation in different corruption regimes. In a laboratory experiment with university students in Mexico, individuals play first a corruption game and then a public goods game. The corruption game is divided into three groups: high- and low-monitoring scenarios as well as a control group not exposed to the game. The public goods game is divided into three groups: the standard game, a game with centralized punishment executed by an exogenously assigned leader, and a game similar to the second one, but adding the possibility of counter-punishment. There are four key results. First, there is more corruption in the low-monitoring group. Second, in the public goods game there is less cooperation in the low-monitoring group than in the group with more intensive monitoring. Third, the option of punishment increases cooperation, but the sensitivity to punishment is greater in the high-monitoring (low-corruption) group. Fourth, the option of counter-punishment of the leader decreases cooperation. Our results highlight the importance of corruption in decreasing trust and social capital and show the difficulty of promoting cooperation when corruption is prevalent.
Schlagwörter: 
Corruption
Cooperation
Leader
Public goods
Laboratory experiment
JEL: 
C90
D73
K42
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by Logo
Dokumentart: 
Article

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
845.21 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.