Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/189332 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2005
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Queen's Economics Department Working Paper No. 1052
Verlag: 
Queen's University, Department of Economics, Kingston (Ontario)
Zusammenfassung: 
We show that interbank markets are a poor substitute for ``broad'' banks that operate across regions or sectors. In the presence of regional or sectoral asset and liquidity shocks, interbank markets can distribute liquidity efficiently, but fail to respond efficiently to asset shocks. Broad banks can condition on the joint distribution of both shocks and, hence, achieve an efficient internal allocation of capital. This allocation involves the cross-subsidization of loans across regions or sectors. Compared to regional banks that are linked through well-functioning interbank markets, broad banks lead to higher levels of aggregate investment, higher output, and less fluctuations within regions. However, broad banks generate endogenously aggregate uncertainty.
Schlagwörter: 
Banking Restrictions
Interbank Markets
Universal Banking
Endogenous Uncertainty
JEL: 
G21
G28
D80
E44
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
210.74 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.