Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/176807 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2014
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] Conservation Letters [ISSN:] 1755-263X [Volume:] 7 [Issue:] 3 [Publisher:] Wiley [Place:] Oxford [Year:] 2014 [Pages:] 149-157
Verlag: 
Wiley, Oxford
Zusammenfassung: 
To address the challenges of biodiversity conservation and commodity production, a framework has been proposed that distinguishes between the integration (“land sharing”) and separation (“land sparing”) of conservation and production. Controversy has arisen around this framework partly because many scholars have focused specifically on food production rather than more encompassing notions such as land scarcity or food security. Controversy further surrounds the practical value of partial trade‐off analyses, the ways in which biodiversity should be quantified, and a series of scale effects that are not readily accounted for. We see key priorities for the future in (1) addressing these issues when using the existing framework, and (2) developing alternative, holistic ways to conceptualise challenges related to food, biodiversity, and land scarcity.
Schlagwörter: 
agroecological intensification
agroecology
food security
food sovereignty
land scarcity
matrix
sustainable intensification
wildlife‐friendly farming
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by-nc-nd Logo
Dokumentart: 
Article
Dokumentversion: 
Published Version

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.