Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/175224 
Year of Publication: 
2016
Series/Report no.: 
Working Paper No. 787
Publisher: 
Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance, London
Abstract: 
Wages are only mildly cyclical, implying that shocks to labour demand have a larger short-run impact on unemployment rather than wages, at odds with the quantitative predictions of the canonical search model - even if wages are only occasionally renegotiated. We argue that one source of the wage flexibility puzzles is plausibly the model for the determination of reservation wages, and consider an alternative reservation wage model based on reference dependence in job search. This extension generates less cyclical reservation wages than the canonical model, as long as reference points are less cyclical than forward-looking components of reservation wages such as the arrival rate of job offers. We provide evidence that reservation wages significantly respond to backward-looking reference points, as proxied by rents earned in previous jobs. In a model calibration we show that backward-looking reference dependence markedly reduces the predicted cyclicality of both wages and reservation wages and can reconcile theoretical predictions of the canonical model with the observed cyclicality of wages and reservation wages.
Subjects: 
Job search
Reservation wages
Wage cyclicality
Reference dependence
JEL: 
E24
J63
J64
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
416.9 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.