Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/172396 
Year of Publication: 
2000
Series/Report no.: 
Upjohn Institute Working Paper No. 00-62
Publisher: 
W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo, MI
Abstract: 
Comparisons among state unemployment insurance (UI) systems can be misleading. Frequently quoted indicators of benefit generosity, tax cost, and adherence to the experience-rating principle are influenced by the relative economic conditions of states. Such comparisons thereby obscure underlying structural differences in state UI systems. A business considering alternative states in which to locate a production facility should be cautious when interpreting UI information in an economic developer's marketing pitch. This paper offers alternative indicators based on how representative firms, with a well specified unemployment experience, would fare in different states. The authors use a micro-simulation approach to model the experiences of representative workers and firms to compare 28 states and contrast the results with those obtained from more conventional indicators. In closing, the authors consider whether a business location decision would be influenced differently by the alternative measures of state UI systems.
Subjects: 
unemployment
insurance
state
O'Leary
Tannenwald
JEL: 
J0
J6
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
204.71 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.