Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/146064 
Year of Publication: 
2016
Citation: 
[Journal:] Wirtschaftsdienst [ISSN:] 1613-978X [Volume:] 96 [Issue:] 8 [Publisher:] Springer [Place:] Heidelberg [Year:] 2016 [Pages:] 620-624
Publisher: 
Springer, Heidelberg
Abstract: 
Politikberatung ist in einer komplexen Umwelt nicht trivial. Versucht man mit theoretischen Modellen Politikfragen zu beantworten, sind die Modellvoraussetzungen entscheidend, aber oft nicht mit der Realität vereinbar. Der Sachverständigenrat setzt auf eine evidenzbasierte Politikberatung. Experimentelle Wirtschaftsforschung und Verhaltensökonomik können eine gute Beratung sinnvoll ergänzen.
Abstract (Translated): 
The work of political advisers becomes more and more important for the political decision-makers in a world of growing complexity. In the past, economic advice was primarily based on theoretical considerations. In the last two decades this has changed and now there is a dominance of evidence-based policy advice. In this paper it is argued that it is necessary not only to rely on conventional empirical evidence but also to take experimental and behavioral evidence into account.
JEL: 
A11
A13
D6
H3
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Published Version

Files in This Item:
File
Size
157.29 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.