Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/125240 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2014
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] IZA World of Labor [ISSN:] 2054-9571 [Article No.:] 15 [Publisher:] Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) [Place:] Bonn [Year:] 2014
Verlag: 
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
Zusammenfassung: 
In reforming unemployment benefit systems, the policy debate should be on the appropriate level of benefits, the subsidies needed for people who cannot contribute enough, and how to finance the subsidies, rather than on whether unemployment insurance or individual unemployment savings accounts are better. Unemployment insurance finances subsidies through implicit taxes on savings, while individual savings accounts with solidarity funds finance subsidies through payroll taxes. Taxes on certain consumption goods and real estate could be considered as well and could be less distortionary.
Schlagwörter: 
unemployment benefits
risk-pooling
savings accounts
labor market
JEL: 
J6
J65
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Dokumentart: 
Article

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
1.29 MB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.