Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/117966 
Year of Publication: 
2004
Series/Report no.: 
Nota di Lavoro No. 86.2004
Publisher: 
Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM), Milano
Abstract: 
An important conclusion from the literature on hydropower is that if there are no other constraints than the available water reservoirs for a year, and operating costs are ignored, the competitive (and socially optimal) outcome is characterized by the (present value) price being constant through the year. A second important conclusion is that the outcome under monopoly generally will differ from this, provided that the demand functions differ across different days (or other sub-periods) of the year. We show that even if the demand function is the same all days of the year, the monopoly outcome will generally differ from the competitive outcome. The difference is caused by the profit function of a price-setting producer of hydropower being non-concave. This non-concavity can be caused by short-run capacity limits either on exports and imports of electricity, or on the supply of alternative electricity sources.
Subjects: 
Electricity prices
Hydropower
JEL: 
L12
L13
L94
Q25
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.