Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/97231 
Authors: 
Year of Publication: 
2013
Series/Report no.: 
Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers No. 496
Publisher: 
Bielefeld University, Center for Mathematical Economics (IMW), Bielefeld
Abstract: 
First via a counter example it is shown that the Proposition 3 of Anbarci & Sun (2013) is false. Then a gap and a mistake in their proof are identified. Finally, a modified version of their Proposition 3 is stated and proved.
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.