Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/89921 
Year of Publication: 
2013
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 7850
Publisher: 
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
Existing estimates of the labor-market returns to human capital give a distorted picture of the role of skills across different economies. International comparisons of earnings analyses rely almost exclusively on school attainment measures of human capital, and evidence incorporating direct measures of cognitive skills is mostly restricted to early-career workers in the United States. Analysis of the new PIAAC survey of adult skills over the full lifecycle in 22 countries shows that the focus on early-career earnings leads to underestimating the lifetime returns to skills by about one quarter. On average, a one-standard-deviation increase in numeracy skills is associated with an 18 percent wage increase among prime-age workers. But this masks considerable heterogeneity across countries. Eight countries, including all Nordic countries, have returns between 12 and 15 percent, while six are above 21 percent with the largest return being 28 percent in the United States. Estimates are remarkably robust to different earnings and skill measures, additional controls, and various subgroups. Intriguingly, returns to skills are systematically lower in countries with higher union density, stricter employment protection, and larger public-sector shares.
Subjects: 
cognitive skills
education
labor market
earnings
international comparisons
JEL: 
J31
I20
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
417.81 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.