Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/88222 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2010
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
ROME Discussion Paper Series No. 10-13
Verlag: 
Research On Money in the Economy (ROME), s.l.
Zusammenfassung (übersetzt): 
Liquidity preference theory had a hard time to defeat the loanable funds approach because Keynes himself failed to elucidate the financing of investment in the General Theory. Liquidity preference is a key element in the credit supply decision of the banking system. Liquidity premium is an equilibrium shadow price of staying liquid in a market economy. The debate on endogenous money tended to blur the distinction between base money and bank deposits. Post-war trends in central banking established the norm of avoiding quantity constraints in refinancing the commercial banking system. This reduced individual motives of keeping liquid reserves, contributed to the lengthening of the chain of financial intermediation, and helped to build up a fragile structure of high-risk investment strategies in financial markets. A re-introduction of quantity constraints in central bank money supply is apt to produce a liquidity preference effect upon interest rates and might help to prevent the emergence of asset price bubbles.
Schlagwörter: 
Liquidity preference
loanable funds
money supply
financial market instability
JEL: 
B2
E4
E5
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
174.7 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.